PostsChallengesPortalsAuthorsBooks
Sign Up
Log In
Posts
Challenges
Portals
Authors
Books
beta
Sign Up
Search
Challenge
help answer one of philosophy's greatest questions: is there a word that could convay NO emotional reaction or meaning?
seek, if there could be a word that has no emotional meaning to either or both speaker or receiver?
Profile avatar image for Stori
Stori

word

I write to recite the noun of renowned that plays as Onomatopoeic and at its core context it is inherently due process for relating the very basis of what we say; for when we say in any language, inflection, dialect, or tirade this one thing, it will always be the same.

Word the word. It can even be used as a vague placeholder to maintain social pace and instead of a response illustrating nothing more than your recognition of it being the time to speak or respond because someone has been flabbing their upper hole in their meat suit at you all day long and normally one will have to receive a validating response intermittently to continue talking which is better tHan sharing space and being quiet together.

Word is the bare minimum whilst also being associated with the full spectrum that is language, and for this challenge it is perfect.

So word word word, word is the word,

and lastly

word to your mother